Introducing the Alumio Route Builder
Now connect, orchestrate, and govern integrations at scale from one visual interface
Financial transactions move between SAP and Visma with the coding applied in transit, so a local finance system and a group ERP can both be right about exactly the same set of underlying figures.
This pairing usually reflects an organisational fact rather than a design decision: a group runs SAP while a country or subsidiary keeps Visma for local accounting. Somebody then rekeys journals between them each month, coding by hand and reconciling differences that come from two charts of accounts and two ideas of a period. Errors are found at consolidation, when there is least time. Connecting SAP and Visma through Alumio removes the retyping: transactions move with their coding translated, references are preserved on both sides, and differences are surfaced as exceptions instead of discovered late.
DATA THAT FLOWS BETWEEN THEM
Journal entries
Chart of accounts mapping
Customer and supplier records
Invoices
Payments
Period references
Transactions move between SAP and Visma with coding applied in transit, so the monthly journal entry exercise and the transcription errors that came with it both stop.
Account mapping is held in configuration rather than a spreadsheet, so a local code always resolves to the same group account and consolidation stops needing interpretation.
Entries that cannot be mapped are raised as exceptions when they occur, so a coding problem is fixed during the month rather than found under pressure at consolidation.
Each entry keeps its originating reference on both sides, so a query can be traced from a group figure back to the local transaction that actually produced it in the first place.
A transaction posted in Visma is delivered to SAP with its account coding translated and its reference preserved, so the group ledger receives a correctly coded entry rather than a summary journal typed in at month end.
When a local account has no mapped group equivalent, Alumio holds the entry and raises it as an exception, so finance resolves the mapping while the period is open instead of posting it to a suspense account and forgetting.
Because references are carried in both directions, a question about a consolidated number can be followed back to the individual Visma transaction behind it without anyone exporting both ledgers and matching amounts.
Alumio sits between sales channels and fulfillment systems as a governed integration backbone. Orders are routed, transformed, and validated, while status updates return to every channel.
Authenticate your systems using Alumio's pre-built connectors. Choose from 200+ connector packages in the marketplace, plus unlimited custom integrations.
Define how data fields map between systems in a visual interface. Adjust formats, enrich records, and apply business logic, no custom code required.
Configure flows to run in real time on events, on a schedule, or both. Reduce manual data entry and let Alumio handle movement and transformation between systems.
.svg){kind=icon}
Once your first integration is live, adding your ERP, PIM, WMS, or CRM connects to the same hub. Existing flows keep running. No rebuilding from scratch.
More can be connected, and payroll or a banking connection is often next, because a subsidiary's local obligations rarely stop at the ledger. Alumio runs those alongside, so the group receives consistent figures while the local finance team keeps the tools their own reporting requirements actually depend on.
Yes. Alumio reads entries from either side and writes them to the other with account coding translated and references preserved, on a schedule that fits your close calendar. Because mapping is configured centrally, both systems apply the same translation every period rather than depending on whoever prepared the journal that month.
Account mapping, period handling and exception rules are configured in the Alumio interface, which takes the place of the manual journals a group-and-subsidiary split usually produces. Both finance systems are configured per organisation, so the Code Transformer covers a coding or currency rule that a mapping table cannot express on its own.
Usually local requirements that a group system serves awkwardly: statutory reporting, local audit expectations, or an accountant whose processes are built around it. That is a legitimate reason to keep both, provided the connection between them is governed rather than manual. The cost of running two ledgers is reconciliation effort, and that is the part worth automating.
Every entry keeps its place in the queue until it posts. Alumio watches both links in real time, records each message with its content, and turns a refusal into an alert naming the entry and the reason it was rejected. Retries deal with transient faults on their own. An unmapped entry is held rather than quietly written to a suspense account nobody revisits.
Talk to an Alumio integration specialist. We'll map the right architecture for your systems, at the right scale, so your operations stay reliable through every change.
.svg)
