A Alumio vivid purple arrow pointing to the right, a visual representation of how to access more page material when clicking on it.
Go back

The hidden risks of legacy systems in manufacturing

By
Carla Hetherington
Published on
March 12, 2025
Updated on
June 24, 2026
IN CONVERSATION WITH

Remco Molenaar

Owner of Miller Digital

Email icon

Rowan Schaap

Team Lead E-commerce Development at Miller Digital

Email icon

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it, right? That’s the mindset many manufacturers still hold when it comes to their legacy systems: outdated software and hardware that continue to run critical operations. However, while these systems may appear to function just fine on the surface, they often hide serious risks beneath. The problem? By the time those risks become obvious, it’s often too late. In our recent conversation with Remco Molenaar and Rowan Schaap from Miller Digital, we explored just how widespread the reliance on legacy systems is in manufacturing, why companies continue to hold onto them, and what manufacturers should consider when upgrading. Here’s what we learned.

How common is it for manufacturers to run mission-critical operations on outdated systems?

Shockingly common. Most mid-sized manufacturers (think 50 to 1,000 employees) are running key operations on software that’s years, sometimes even decades, out of date. A survey by TrendMicro revealed that a majority of manufacturers were still using operating systems like Windows XP, introduced in 2001 and no longer supported, underscoring the widespread reliance on obsolete technology.

Why? Because, in many cases, upgrading isn’t seen as a priority. Large enterprises tend to have the budget and dedicated IT teams to stay ahead, but mid-sized firms often rely on a handful of IT staff (or even just one person) to keep things running. Without a clear business case, upper management tends to push modernization down the road.

Almost every manufacturing company we’ve worked with has mission-critical operations running on outdated software. However, not modernizing your IT landscape is like putting the hand break on innovation.”

Remco Molenaar

Additionally, the preference for on-premise servers presents another challenge. Many manufacturers are bound by long-term contracts and substantial infrastructure investments, making the shift to cloud solutions appear as an unnecessary expense. However, maintaining outdated systems can lead to higher maintenance costs over time due to dwindling vendor support and increased expenses for custom patches and updates.

What are the biggest risks of relying on legacy technology?

1. Cybersecurity vulnerabilities – Old systems lack modern security protocols, making them prime targets for cyberattacks. Many manufacturers don’t realize how exposed they are until a breach happens.

2. Downtime and system failure – When something breaks, who fixes it? If a system is so outdated that the vendor no longer supports it, getting it back up and running can take days or even weeks, bringing production to a standstill.

3. Compliance issues – Many manufacturers aren’t even aware of how their legacy systems put them at risk of non-compliance with evolving industry regulations, whether it’s cybersecurity, environmental standards, or traceability requirements.

4. Scalability and inefficiency – Modern manufacturing relies on automation and data-driven decision-making. Outdated systems make it nearly impossible to integrate new technologies, limiting a company’s ability to grow and compete.

Learn more about common challenges manufacturers face today →

The hidden costs of legacy systems

At first glance, maintaining an old system seems cheaper than upgrading. After all, if the system still works, why spend thousands (or millions) to replace it? But the hidden costs of sticking with outdated technology quickly add up:

High maintenance costs – Older systems require constant patching and workarounds, and hiring specialists to maintain them can be expensive.

Missed opportunities – Companies stuck on legacy systems struggle to adopt new tech like AI-driven quality control, robotics, and predictive maintenance, all key components of Industry 4.0.

Risk of sudden failure – If a critical system goes down and no one knows how to fix it, operations grind to a halt. We’ve seen cases where manufacturers faced multi-week outages because their legacy systems had no backup or replacement plan.

Supply chain bottlenecks – Many manufacturers rely on outdated ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) software that wasn’t built for today’s fast-paced, interconnected logistics environment. As a result, inventory tracking becomes inaccurate, leading to stockouts or overstocking, real-time order processing isn’t possible, production is slowing down, and integration with modern logistics providers is difficult, causing delays.

Can Long-Term Support keep End-of-Life technology running safely?

Strictly speaking, Long Term Support (LTS) can play a crucial role in extending the usability of End-of-Life (EoL) technology by providing critical security patches, stability updates, and limited compatibility enhancements, even after mainstream support has ended. However, as Rowan Schaap points out, relying on LTS is a temporary solution:

Long Term Support can be a lifeline for manufacturers relying on End-of-Life technology, since it helps mitigate immediate security risks and ensures compliance, allowing businesses to maintain operational continuity while planning upgrades. But LTS is a temporary fix, while it keeps outdated systems running, it doesn’t introduce new features or solve long-term scalability challenges, making modernization inevitable."

When should manufacturers replace vs. integrate legacy systems?

Not every outdated system needs to be thrown out immediately. In many cases, manufacturers can use middleware solutions, such as an Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), to connect old systems with modern applications. This allows for a phased, composable approach to digital transformation rather than an expensive, all-at-once overhaul.

However, there are cases where replacement is the only real option. If a system has reached the end of its life, is no longer supported by the vendor, or is actively blocking the company’s ability to scale, then delaying replacement is only making the inevitable transition more painful and expensive.

Discover the key advantages of composable manufacturing →

How to minimize disruption when upgrading legacy systems

One of the biggest fears manufacturers have is that upgrading will cause major disruptions to operations. But with the right strategy, it doesn’t have to be painful:

Take a phased approach – Start by integrating modern solutions with existing systems before replacing them entirely.

Ensure leadership buy-in – IT teams often struggle to communicate the urgency of upgrades to upper management. Framing the issue in terms of business impact rather than technical risks, such as lost revenue, compliance risks, and competitive disadvantages, helps drive action.

Bring in outside expertise if needed – If internal IT teams lack the experience or authority to drive change, an external consultant can help bridge the gap between technical and business priorities.

Don't let legacy technology hold you back

Manufacturers can no longer afford to ignore the risks of running mission-critical operations on legacy systems. While the upfront costs of upgrading can seem daunting, the hidden expenses and operational risks of sticking with outdated technology are far greater. The key is to take a proactive approach. Whether it’s through strategic integration, middleware solutions, or a full digital transformation, Miller Digital can help you make the shift. Future-proof your operations and start modernizing today with Miller Digital.

Turn AI ambition into action

Portrait of Leonie Becher Merli, Business Development Manager at Alumio

Get a free assessment of your integration needs and next steps

Portrait of Leonie Becher Merli, Business Development Manager at Alumio

No items found.
Topics in this blog:

FAQ

Integration Platform-ipaas-slider-right
What are the hidden risks of legacy systems in manufacturing?

Legacy manufacturing systems appear stable on the surface but hide significant risks: security vulnerabilities from unpatched operating systems and software that vendors no longer support, integration brittleness as modern systems cannot connect to legacy APIs without expensive custom middleware, knowledge concentration in a shrinking pool of specialists who understand how the legacy system works, inability to adopt Industry 4.0 technologies (IoT, AI, real-time analytics) that require modern API interfaces, and the escalating cost of emergency fixes when legacy systems eventually fail without the support infrastructure to resolve them quickly.

Integration Platform-ipaas-slider-right
When do legacy systems become a competitive liability for manufacturers?

Legacy systems become a competitive liability when: the inability to integrate them with modern digital commerce platforms prevents manufacturers from accessing new customer segments, competitor manufacturers offer real-time inventory visibility, self-service ordering, and delivery tracking that legacy-constrained businesses cannot match, the cost of maintaining legacy integration (custom middleware, legacy specialists) exceeds the cost of modernization, Industry 4.0 investment in smart manufacturing technology produces limited value because legacy ERP and MES systems cannot consume the data it generates, and talent attraction becomes harder as engineers prefer to work with modern technology stacks.

Integration Platform-ipaas-slider-right
How can manufacturers modernize integration with legacy systems without replacing them?

Manufacturers can modernize legacy system integration without replacement by deploying an integration platform that sits between legacy systems and modern applications: Alumio connects to legacy ERP systems (SAP ECC via BAPIs and IDocs, legacy Dynamics via XML web services) using protocol-specific connectors while exposing the integration to modern applications through standard API interfaces. This allows manufacturers to connect legacy ERP to modern e-commerce, PIM, and analytics platforms without ERP replacement, capturing the connectivity benefits of modernization while deferring the cost and risk of full system replacement until the business is ready for it.

Integration Platform-ipaas-slider-right
What is the risk of delaying legacy system modernization?

The risk of delaying modernization compounds over time: security vulnerabilities accumulate without patches, integration technical debt grows as more modern systems require custom connectors to legacy interfaces, the pool of specialists who can maintain legacy systems shrinks (raising their cost or making them unavailable), and the eventual replacement becomes more complex and risky as the legacy system becomes more deeply embedded in business processes. The most dangerous risk is path dependency: waiting until a legacy system fails creates a high-pressure replacement under adverse conditions, whereas planned modernization allows proper testing, parallel running, and data migration.

Integration Platform-ipaas-slider-right
How does Alumio help manufacturers bridge legacy and modern systems?

Alumio bridges legacy and modern systems by supporting both legacy integration protocols (SAP BAPIs and IDocs, legacy XML web services, SFTP file-based integration for older systems without APIs) and modern API-based connections (REST, GraphQL, webhook-triggered flows) from the same platform. A manufacturer can connect legacy SAP ECC to modern Shopify B2B, cloud PIM, and AI analytics through the same Alumio backbone: enabling digital commerce and Industry 4.0 capabilities without replacing the ERP. As the manufacturer's modernization roadmap progresses, each legacy system replaced connects to Alumio's existing backbone rather than requiring new custom connections to all modern systems.

Integration Platform-ipaas-slider-right
What is the recommended approach for manufacturers planning legacy system modernization?

The recommended approach is: begin with an integration audit that documents all legacy system dependencies (which modern systems connect to the legacy ERP and how), deploy an integration platform that bridges legacy and modern systems (so the modernization path is incremental rather than requiring a simultaneous legacy replacement and integration rebuild), prioritize legacy system modernization by business risk and opportunity (starting with systems that most limit digital commerce capability or create the highest security risk), and plan the integration architecture for the modernized state in advance of each replacement (so the new system connects to the existing integration backbone from day one rather than requiring a new integration project alongside the system replacement).

Get a free assessment of your integration needs

Laptop screen displaying the Alumio iPaaS dashboard, alongside pop-up windows for generating cron expressions, selecting labels and route overview.